Online Health Records

  • Subscribe to our RSS feed.
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Digg

Saturday, 16 April 2011

Lies, damned lies and statistics: How do you turn 61% into 95%?

Posted on 11:03 by Unknown
Image from "Working together for a stronger NHS" Crown Copyright


Edit: 13/05/11 An analysis of the BSA 2007 dataset by Siobhan Farmer, Mark Hawker and myself has been published today in the new publication Lancet UK Policy Matters. You can find it here. We conclude that it is not possible to conclude that 95% of respondents wished for more choice. Using the kind of suppositions given below it may be possible to infer that between 61% and 72% may have thought there should be more choice, but the survey was not designed to answer this question. 
..........................................................................................................................................................
Edit: 17/4/11 I and a colleague have independently tried to verify Mark's analysis. We have reached similar conclusions but they don't corroborate Mark's results. Unfortunately he is currently outside the UK. We will update with our own results in the UK. We are in agreement that there is still no justification for claiming that "95% of people want more choice in healthcare". 

..................................................................................................................................................................
Today many of you will have read Ben Goldacre's excellent  analysis of the leaflet which the Department of Health issued last week to help the public understand why they were pursuing reforms of the NHS which are facing widespread opposition. 

Page 11 of the leaflet contains the graphic above stating that 95% of those surveyed in the 25th British Social Attitudes Survey  wanted MORE choice in the NHS. When Ben looked at the published reports he found that 'Do you want more choice in the NHS?' was not a question in the survey. Instead respondents were asked 'How much choice do you think you should have?' and 'How much choice do you actually have?'  But if you could establish how many people thought they should have choice but who currently think that they don't have choice then you might be able to say how many people think that they should have more choice. As Ben points out to answer this you would need to have individual level data. When he asked the DOH for the dataset they unfortunately pointed him to a book chapter.

But fortunately the day this leaflet was published, April 6th, 2011, Mark Hawker  started wondering if he could find out more about this dataset. And he did find more. The individual level data is available to download. So Mark did that. Then he analysed it. And what did he find?  Well, you can read a lot more in the blog post that he published on April 7th but here is a summary.

13% thought they had more choice that they thought they should have.
46% thought they had just the right amount of choice.
41% thought they should have more choice that they had.

So how did the DOH manage to get this so wrong? How did they confuse 41% with 95%? Why weren't they able to direct Ben Goldacre to the correct data source? And why have they decided not to fund this survey in the future?

Hopefully someone can help make the correct data look just as pretty as the incorrect infographic in the leaflet. In the meantime I think I'd like to thank Mark for his work, and to agree with this tweet:

Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to Facebook
Posted in #nhs, #nhsreform, #opendata | No comments
Newer Post Older Post Home

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Popular Posts

  • #300seconds talk on health professionals and social media
    What is #300seconds about? Getting more women to speak about digital and tech issues. I was one of the 12 speakers at the 1st event in May...
  • Social media as part of a new professionalism : #GMCConf
    Add caption Two years ago I attended a GMC education conference in the London. The conference had no hashtag so I and some others decided to...
  • Where do first year medical students look things up?
    In the last two days I have spoken to 31 first year medical students about their early clinical attachments in primary and seconday care. I...
  • What happens when you invite students to collaborate on a google doc....
    Confused Sign Originally uploaded by kudaker ..... and you use their university email address? I've had a gmail account for years. I...
  • E-alerts for Medical Education... are you listening #meded journals?
    One of my colleagues when I was a medical student at Queen's University, Belfast got in touch today. He does some really interesting wor...
  • Web 2.0 tools and medical education - more sceptical comments
    Last week, @drves described me as a web2.0 skeptic . Those who know me in 'real-life' would certainly agree that I ask many questio...
  • Reflections from #DotMed13
    The last year has been very good for meeting great people. I first met Irish rheumatologist Ronan Kavanagh in Dublin in this year. That wa...
  • Talking to medical students about social media and medicine
    This afternoon I had a short session with about 25 medical students talking about social media and medicine.We had a general chat and discus...
  • Chatting on Twitter about Medical Education
    Image: Coversations at Vermillion by  JeanineAnderson A few years ago when I started blogging and tweeting my aim was to try and connect wit...
  • Social Media Monitoring in Healthcare
    Search Privacy by Mushon One year ago a story was shared on the nhssm (NHS social media) blog . The story was about what happened when St. ...

Categories

  • #1carejc
  • #300seconds
  • #altc2011
  • #asme2012
  • #cu_tee
  • #epatcon
  • #ev2011
  • #foamed
  • #meded
  • #mlearm
  • #mysurvey
  • #nhs
  • #nhsreform
  • #nhssm
  • #oer
  • #opendata
  • alt-c
  • amee
  • anonymity
  • arts
  • asme
  • audio
  • blackboard
  • blog
  • bma. gmc
  • boundaries
  • camtasia
  • citeulike
  • clinical
  • collaboration
  • colles
  • COMET
  • communication
  • conference
  • confidentiality
  • connections
  • consumer
  • conversation starters
  • cpd
  • creep treehouse
  • data
  • definitions
  • del.ic.ious
  • delicious
  • depression
  • digital competency
  • digital literacy
  • digital professionalism
  • digitaldivide
  • diigo
  • doctorate
  • doctors
  • ebm
  • EdD
  • edublogger
  • ehr
  • Elsevier
  • empathy
  • empowerment
  • epatient
  • ethics
  • evidence
  • expansive
  • f2f
  • Facebook
  • FCS
  • feedback
  • first year
  • flickr
  • friendfeed
  • future
  • games
  • gmc
  • google plus
  • googledocs
  • gp
  • guardian
  • guidance
  • hangouts on air
  • hashtag
  • hcsm
  • health
  • health information
  • health professionals
  • humanities
  • identity
  • information literacy
  • is blogging dead?
  • itunes
  • journal club
  • keepstream
  • learning
  • learning environment
  • learning styles
  • lecture
  • medical education
  • medical humour
  • medical student
  • metaphors
  • mindmap
  • mozilla popcorn maker
  • muir gray
  • narrative
  • nature of medicine
  • network literacy
  • networks
  • NING
  • nomenclature
  • nurses
  • oer
  • online
  • open source
  • openscience
  • organisation
  • patient
  • patient decision aids
  • patients
  • pda
  • pdf
  • peru
  • PhD
  • ple
  • podcast
  • prezi
  • primary care
  • privacy
  • professionalism
  • psychosocial
  • reddit
  • reflection
  • renal
  • research
  • rss
  • scepticism
  • screencast
  • screenr
  • sdm
  • shared decision making
  • sharing
  • slang
  • slidecast
  • slideshare
  • social bookmarking
  • social media
  • social networking
  • social sciences
  • storify
  • survey
  • surveymonkey
  • symptom
  • TED
  • tools
  • transformativelearning
  • tripanswers
  • tripdatabase
  • tweetchat
  • twine
  • twitter
  • uncertainty empathy
  • video
  • vle
  • web2.0
  • wikipedia
  • women
  • wordle
  • wrist fracture
  • youtube
  • zoomq3

Blog Archive

  • ►  2013 (20)
    • ►  December (4)
    • ►  November (1)
    • ►  October (2)
    • ►  September (2)
    • ►  August (1)
    • ►  July (1)
    • ►  May (2)
    • ►  April (6)
    • ►  March (1)
  • ►  2012 (33)
    • ►  November (3)
    • ►  October (3)
    • ►  September (1)
    • ►  August (1)
    • ►  July (3)
    • ►  June (2)
    • ►  May (2)
    • ►  April (10)
    • ►  February (5)
    • ►  January (3)
  • ▼  2011 (39)
    • ►  November (2)
    • ►  October (1)
    • ►  September (6)
    • ►  August (1)
    • ►  July (5)
    • ►  June (6)
    • ►  May (8)
    • ▼  April (2)
      • Location and Learning
      • Lies, damned lies and statistics: How do you turn ...
    • ►  March (5)
    • ►  February (1)
    • ►  January (2)
  • ►  2010 (31)
    • ►  October (2)
    • ►  September (3)
    • ►  August (5)
    • ►  July (3)
    • ►  June (1)
    • ►  May (1)
    • ►  March (9)
    • ►  February (1)
    • ►  January (6)
  • ►  2009 (31)
    • ►  December (4)
    • ►  November (1)
    • ►  October (2)
    • ►  September (4)
    • ►  July (4)
    • ►  June (2)
    • ►  May (1)
    • ►  April (4)
    • ►  March (1)
    • ►  February (2)
    • ►  January (6)
  • ►  2008 (31)
    • ►  December (9)
    • ►  November (9)
    • ►  October (13)
Powered by Blogger.

About Me

Unknown
View my complete profile